College Football Playoff Rankings Expansion Top 12 Projection After Third Top 25
Contact/Follow @ColFootballNews & @PeteFiutak
Bowl Projections | CFN Week 11 Rankings 1-131
CFP Top 25: Week 3 | CFP rankings reaction
Remember, the College Football Playoff rankings are a snapshot of the moment – they don’t project.
They’re going to change, the big games are coming up, and this will all shake out. But if the expanded College Football Playoff was in place for this year with 12 teams with automatic bids for the top six conference champions, what would it potentially be?
After the third College Football Playoff rankings were released, an expanded playoff would look like this …
Top Four Projected Seeds After the Third College Football Playoff rankings (top four conference champions)
1. Georgia (SEC): Sugar Bowl
2. Ohio State (Big Ten): Rose Bowl
3. TCU (Big 12): Orange Bowl
4. USC (Pac-12): Cotton Bowl
At-Large Seeds
12. UCF (AAC champion) at
5. Michigan (Big Ten)
11. Penn State (Big Ten) at
6. Tennessee (SEC)
10. Utah (Pac-12) at
7. LSU (SEC)
9. Clemson (ACC Champion) at
8. Alabama (SEC)
Second Round Bracket Projection
1. Georgia (SEC): Sugar Bowl vs
8. Alabama (SEC)
2. Ohio State (Big Ten): Rose Bowl vs
7. LSU (SEC)
3. TCU (Big 12): Orange Bowl vs
6. Tennessee (SEC)
4. USC (Pac-12): Cotton Bowl
5. Michigan (Big Ten)
Top Four Teams That Would Be Left Out
Oregon (Pac-12), North Carolina (ACC), Ole Miss (SEC), Kansas State (Big 12)
Here’s how it’s going to work (this is from the College Football Playoff):
1. The 12 teams will be the six conference champions ranked highest by the selection committee (no minimum ranking requirement), plus the six highest-ranked teams not included among the six highest-ranked conference champions.
2. The ranking of the teams will continue to be done by a selection committee whose size, composition, and method of selection will remain substantially unchanged.
3. The four highest-ranked conference champions will be seeded one through four and each will receive a first-round bye.
4. The other eight teams will play in the first round with the higher seeds hosting the lower seeds either on campus or at other sites designated by the higher-seeded institution (No. 12 at No. 5, No. 11 at No. 6, No. 10 at No. 7 and No. 9 at No. 8.
5. The model allows for first-round games to be played on either the second or third weekend in December in a way that best accommodates the format and the participating teams, with at least 12 days between the conference championship games and the first-round games. The Management Committee would make the final determination of the calendar.
6. Subject to reaching agreement with bowls, the four quarterfinal games and two Playoff Semifinal games would be played in bowls on a rotating basis.
7. The national championship game will continue to be played at a neutral site.
8. Subject to reaching agreement with bowls, the four highest-ranked conference champions will be assigned to quarterfinals bowls on selection day in ranking order, and in consideration of current contract bowl relationships if those bowls are selected for the rotation. For example, if the Pac-12 champion were ranked #1, the Big Ten champion were ranked #3, and the Rose Bowl were a quarterfinal site, the Pac-12 champion would be assigned to the Rose Bowl and the Big Ten champion would be assigned elsewhere.
9. With the four highest-ranked champions assigned to quarterfinal games in bowls, the opponent from first-round game winners will be assigned by the selection committee based on the bracket.
10. The higher seeds would receive preferential placement in the Playoff Semifinal games.
