Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Top News
Top News

Closing Arguments Set In Trial Of Colorado Supermarket Shooter

Ahmad Al Aliwi Alissa, accused of killing 10 people at a Colorado supermarket in March 2021, is led into a courtroom for a hearing, Sept. 7, 2021, in Boulder, Colo. (AP Photo/David Zalubowski,

Closing arguments are scheduled to take place on Friday in the trial of a mentally ill man who carried out a deadly shooting at a Colorado supermarket in 2021. The defendant, who has been identified as having schizophrenia, has entered a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity for the attack that claimed the lives of 10 individuals in Boulder.

It is important to note that mental illness and legal insanity are distinct concepts. In Colorado, insanity is defined as a mental disease so severe that it renders an individual incapable of distinguishing between right and wrong.

Throughout the trial, families of the victims were exposed to graphic surveillance footage and police body camera recordings. Survivors recounted their harrowing experiences of fleeing, assisting others to safety, and seeking refuge. Testimonies revealed chilling details, such as a pharmacist overhearing the shooter express that the ordeal was 'fun' multiple times.

Family members of the defendant shared that his behavior had changed in the years leading up to the shooting, with signs of paranoia and auditory hallucinations becoming increasingly apparent following a bout of COVID-19 in late 2020.

The defendant faces multiple charges, including 10 counts of first-degree murder and possession of prohibited high-capacity ammunition magazines. The prosecution alleges that the shooter, armed with specialized equipment and ammunition, deliberately targeted individuals attempting to flee or hide, seeking to maximize casualties.

Forensic psychologists who assessed the defendant's mental state during the shootings concluded that he was legally sane at the time of the incident. While the defense did not present expert testimony to support an insanity defense, they highlighted the psychologists' lack of full confidence in their findings due to limited information provided by the defendant.

The experts acknowledged the role of auditory hallucinations in the attack and suggested that the incident may not have occurred had the defendant not been suffering from mental illness.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.