Clear, a service that allows travelers to skip security lines at airports for a fee of $189, is facing potential changes in California. Some lawmakers in the state are concerned that Clear creates a divide between those who can afford the service and those who cannot.
The bill, which has passed the Senate Transportation Committee with an 8-4 vote, aims to place a moratorium on Clear's expansion at state airports. To become law, the bill must be approved by the full California Senate, Assembly, and signed by Governor Gavin Newsom.
Clear, a publicly-traded security company, offers expedited security screening at airports, sports venues, and concerts. Members can verify their identity using biometric data like face scans or fingerprints at airport kiosks, bypassing the need to show ID to TSA agents. Once verified, Clear members are escorted to the front of TSA security lines by company employees.
However, the line-skipping privilege has sparked frustration among non-members who feel it is unfair. Senator Josh Newman, who introduced the bill, argues that airport security should not be contingent on income or willingness to pay.
The proposed legislation does not seek to eliminate Clear but rather to require separate lines for Clear members and non-members. This would prevent non-members from feeling disadvantaged and ensure a smoother experience for all travelers.
The bill has garnered support from flight attendant associations and TSA agent unions but faces opposition from Clear, major airlines, California airports, and business groups.
Clear has emphasized its positive impact on the state, creating jobs, serving nearly 1 million residents, and contributing millions in revenue to California airports. The company aims to work collaboratively with partners and government entities to enhance checkpoint experiences for all travelers.
An analysis of the bill suggests that airports may seek alternative revenue sources if Clear's income is affected. Additionally, the challenge of obtaining dedicated TSA security lines and screeners is highlighted, as TSA operations fall under federal jurisdiction.
While the bill may face hurdles in implementation, it underscores the ongoing debate around equity and efficiency in airport security procedures.
