California Governor Gavin Newsom has put forth a proposal to address the state's estimated $45 billion deficit by eliminating an important health benefit for certain low-income immigrants with disabilities. This move has sparked criticism from advocates and allies who accuse the governor of reneging on promises.
California recently extended free health insurance to all low-income adults, regardless of immigration status, making over 1 million individuals eligible for the state's Medicaid program. However, Newsom's current proposal aims to cease funding for caregivers who assist disabled immigrants with daily tasks to help them remain independent.
The governor's plan is projected to save approximately $94 million and would affect fewer than 3,000 individuals out of the 15 million enrolled in Medi-Cal. Critics argue that this decision could hinder future eligibility for thousands more.
The proposed cut to in-home supportive services, which has seen rising costs, particularly in caregiver wages, has drawn backlash. Advocates emphasize the program's significance in providing financial support to families caring for disabled loved ones.
While the California Department of Social Services plans to mitigate the impact on current beneficiaries by exploring alternative government-funded programs, concerns remain about the potential consequences of the proposed cuts.
Newsom's budget plan, which includes various austerity measures, reflects the challenges posed by consecutive deficits after years of surpluses. The governor's efforts to navigate these fiscal dilemmas have strained his relationship with progressive supporters.
As the state Legislature, dominated by Democrats, prepares to draft its budget proposal by mid-June, discussions on restoring the proposed cuts, including those to health care for certain immigrants, are underway. The negotiations between Newsom and legislative leaders will shape the final spending plan, with a target to pass the budget by July 1.
While the budget process unfolds, Newsom's decisions hold significant weight, as he ultimately determines whether to approve or veto the Legislature's budget proposal.
