During the ongoing trial involving Michael Cohen, Judge Schwartz provided insights into the cross-examination strategy employed by Blanche. Blanche's approach has been characterized by a non-linear nature, deviating from the traditional step-by-step method used by the state.
One aspect of Blanche's strategy involves repeatedly circling back to certain topics, such as Cohen's interactions with journalists to manipulate media coverage. By revisiting these subjects, Blanche aims to maximize the impact of his questioning on Cohen while also keeping the jury engaged.
Judge Schwartz acknowledged the potential risks and benefits of this approach. On one hand, a non-linear presentation could confuse the jury and lead to disengagement, as observed in earlier reports of jurors becoming bored. However, by varying the focus of questioning and maintaining the jury's attention, Blanche seeks to prevent such lapses in attentiveness.
The courtroom atmosphere reflects the jury's high level of attentiveness, with jurors typically paying close attention to the proceedings. Judge Schwartz humorously noted that managing to bore such a focused jury would be an unusual feat.
Overall, Blanche's strategy appears to be a calculated attempt to extract as much information from Cohen as possible while also managing the jury's interest. The trial continues to unfold as both sides navigate the complexities of the legal proceedings.
