TOKYO — President Joe Biden said Monday that the United States would intervene militarily in Taiwan if necessary, in an apparent shift away from the U.S. policy of “strategic ambiguity” that quickly ratcheted up tensions with China.
The comment — not the first instance of Biden’s blunt rhetoric on the world stage causing confusion and geopolitical uncertainty — suggested a willingness from Biden to go further in defending Taiwan than he has in aiding Ukraine, which has received tens of billions of dollars in arms and intelligence assistance but not the direct intervention of U.S. or NATO troops.
“You didn’t want to get involved in the Ukraine conflict militarily for obvious reasons,” a reporter said to Biden during the president’s joint news conference in Tokyo with Prime Minister Fumio Kishida. “Are you willing to get involved militarily to defend Taiwan if it comes to that?”
“Yes,” Biden responded, adding: “That’s the commitment we made.”
But he said an invasion of the island by China was highly unlikely.
“My expectation is it will not happen,” Biden said. “It will not be attempted.”
Biden made similar comments at a televised town hall in October, only to have the White House walk them back. The U.S. has made a commitment to provide Taiwan the means to defend itself but — just as there is no NATO obligation for the U.S. to defend Ukraine — has no treaty to defend it militarily.
Before making the comments, Biden said U.S. policy toward Taiwan “has not changed at all.”
But he also warned China against an invasion and said it was important for the U.S. and other nations to send a signal to Beijing by upholding sanctions imposed on Russia after its invasion of Ukraine.
“Russia has to pay a long-term price for that in terms of the sanctions. It’s not just about Ukraine,” Biden said, adding that, if Russia were not made to suffer long-term consequences, “what signal does that send to China about the cost of attempting to take Taiwan by force?”
The comments drew a swift response from Beijing. Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Wang Wenbin expressed “strong dissatisfaction and resolute opposition” to Biden’s comments.
“China has no room for compromise or concessions on issues involving China’s core interests such as sovereignty and territorial integrity,” he said. “China will take firm action to safeguard its sovereignty and security interests, and we will do what we say.”
For its part, the Taiwanese government said in a statement that it was grateful to the U.S. for “reaffirming its rock-solid commitment to Taiwan.”
A White House official, speaking on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak publicly, insisted that the U.S. stance had not shifted regarding Taiwan. For decades, Washington has pursued a policy of “strategic ambiguity” that does not spell out exactly what the U.S. would do if the democratically self-governed island — which China claims as its rightful territory — were attacked.
“As the president said, our policy has not changed. He reiterated our one-China policy and our commitment to peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait,” the official said. “He also reiterated our commitment under the Taiwan Relations Act to provide Taiwan with the military means to defend itself.”
The act dates back to 1979, when Washington switched diplomatic recognition from Taipei to Beijing.
Biden’s comment in Tokyo was reminiscent of his remarks in Warsaw two months ago when he declared that Russian President Vladimir Putin “cannot remain in power,” forcing aides to quickly clarify that the president was speaking in a personal capacity and not, in fact, announcing a drastic shift in U.S. policy to one of regime change in Moscow.
But in this instance, some foreign policy experts took issue more with the administration’s quick downplaying of Biden’s remarks rather than with their substance.
Richard N. Haass, the president of the Council on Foreign Relations, tweeted that a shift to a policy of “strategic clarity” was “exactly right given China’s military buildup.” In the event of an invasion, Taiwan’s geography as an island nation and its military weakness compared with that of Ukraine, he said, would require the kind of direct military involvement that the U.S. has steered clear of with regard to Ukraine.
“This is the third time @POTUS has spoken out in favor of strategic clarity on Taiwan and third time WH staff has tried to walk it back,” Haass wrote. “Better to embrace it as new US stance, one that is fully consistent with one-China policy but that alters how US will go about implementing it.”
Ian Bremmer, president of the Eurasia Group, a New York-based global risk assessment firm, said a U.S. position muddled by an apparent gap between Biden’s comments and his administration’s stated policy position could be advantageous in creating more confusion in Beijing. But there is no need to create additional uncertainty and tension with China at the moment, Bremmer said.
“There was never credibility around the notion of the U.S. going to war in Ukraine and there has always been credibility about military involvement in Taiwan, so in a way this is much ado about nothing,” Bremmer said. “But we are right now in a better position vis-a-vis China: The Russian military is showing they are completely incapable, and the U.S. is leading a much stronger allied response to Ukraine than anyone thought possible, and the Chinese are taking that away as a lesson. So this really isn’t the time we need to be making hay on Taiwan.”
The situation regarding Taiwan has historically been one of the prime flashpoints in Sino-U.S. relations, with even the slightest shifts in policy or tone parsed thoroughly in Beijing, Taipei and Washington.
In 2001, when then-President George W. Bush made similar comments to Biden’s, vowing that the U.S. would do “whatever it took” to help Taiwan defend itself, the administration also insisted that U.S. policy had not changed.
Kishida, speaking at the same news conference, said the subject of Taiwan had come up in his meeting earlier Monday with Biden and that there was no fundamental change in policy by either country.
“We are against any unilateral attempt to change the status quo by force in Asia,” he said. He said that was why Japan had been cooperating with U.S.-led efforts to sanction Russia and provide assistance to Ukraine.
Kishida reiterated the importance of the U.S. commitment to defend Japan in case it is attacked.
“We have full confidence in the response of the United States,” he said.
———
(Bierman reported from Tokyo and Stokols from Washington. Henry Chu in London and Stephanie Yang in Taipei, Taiwan, contributed to this report.)
———
