Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Top News
Top News
Politics

Biden finally responds to Iran attacks, but is it enough?

Over 100 attacks on US troops in the Middle East since October.

Title: Escalating Attacks in Kurdistan Prompt Retaliatory Strikes on Hezbollah Targets

In a surprising turn of events, the previously considered safer region of Kurdistan has become the epicenter of intense attacks, showcasing a disturbing trend in escalating violence. The origin of these attacks has been attributed to Iran, specifically its proxy groups operating in the region. In response, the United States overnight launched retaliatory strikes on Hezbollah targets in Iraq. This action comes after a string of over 100 attacks on U.S. troops in the Middle East since mid-October.

Recent reports confirm that Kurdistan, which was once viewed as a relatively secure area in the Kurdish region, has experienced a significant surge in militant activities. These attacks have targeted American troops, resulting in injuries, with the latest incident leaving one service member in critical condition.

Mike Lown, former National Security Council member under President George W. Bush and Managing Director of Beacon Global Strategies, expressed his satisfaction with the President's decision to retaliate. However, Lown believes that the response should have come sooner in order to prevent injuries altogether. He points out that President Biden's approach appears to be to retaliate only when a U.S. troop or contractor is harmed, creating a red line for action. Lown argues for a strong and decisive response earlier in the cycle to deter further aggression by hostile actors.

The frequency and severity of attacks on U.S. service members in Iraq since October have brought into question a statement made by National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan on September 30th. Sullivan had expressed the belief that the Middle East region was experiencing a lull in conflict, reducing the need for constant crisis management. However, events following his statement, such as the deadly attack launched by Hamas on Israel, indicate otherwise.

Lown describes Sullivan's statement as a regrettable gaffe, emphasizing that the world is more interconnected now than ever before. The collaboration between Iran, China, and Russia against the United States highlights the need for continued vigilance and deterrence in all major geopolitical theaters.

Shifting focus to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu outlined what he perceives as prerequisites for peace in an article for the Wall Street Journal. Netanyahu asserts that peace can only be achieved by dismantling Hamas, demilitarizing Gaza, and deradicalizing Palestinian society. However, proposed plans by Egypt, which incorporate Hamas into a transitional government, have added complexity to the situation.

Lown acknowledges the challenges ahead, particularly demanding compromise from Israel so soon after the violent attacks. He suggests allowing the current situation in Gaza to unfold and then working towards progress, rather than forcing compromises amidst ongoing conflict. Israel aims to rebuild its deterrence to prevent future attacks before engaging in negotiations.

As the situation in Kurdistan intensifies and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict remains a volatile issue, the need for heightened vigilance, strategic action, and diplomatic initiatives becomes paramount. The United States, in close collaboration with its allies, must navigate these challenges with astuteness and resolve to ensure stability and peace in the region.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.