Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
ABC News
ABC News
National

Ben Roberts-Smith's case against ex-wife complicated after judge raises 'relationship' with lawyer

A judge said he was "surprised" it was left to him to raise the issue of Roberts-Smith's reported connection to lawyer Monica Allen (left). (AAP: Damon Cleary, ABC News)

Legal action launched by Ben Roberts-Smith against his ex-wife has been complicated after a judge raised the potentially "embarrassing" situation of media reports that he spent time socially with a lawyer.

Mr Roberts-Smith took Emma Roberts to court last week, on the eve of his high-stakes defamation trial against Nine Entertainment Co, over allegations she was accessing an email account he used for confidential legal correspondence.

Mr Roberts-Smith is suing The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age and The Canberra Times in a separate case over allegations of war crimes, bullying and domestic violence.

The veteran's legal team told the court it had questioned whether Ms Roberts passed the information, which is alleged to have included privileged material about the defamation case and the Afghanistan inquiry, on to other parties including Nine Entertainment Co.

But during a hearing in the Federal Court on Wednesday morning, Justice Robert Bromwich raised a media report about Mr Roberts-Smith's connection to solicitor Monica Allen, who has been working on the defamation case.

Last August, News Corp published photographs of Mr Roberts-Smith riding scooters and holding hands with Ms Allen in Brisbane.

Ben Roberts-Smith launched legal action against his ex-wife. (AAP: Dan Himbrechts)

Ms Allen was the deponent of an affidavit filed in the case against Emma Roberts.

"I'm trying not to put the deponent of the affidavit in an awkward position," Justice Bromwich said.

"It's an embarrassing potential situation, it may be false. I have to deal with the reality that I have become aware of info that may or may not be correct."

The judge requested Mr Roberts-Smith's barrister, Arthur Moses SC, seek instructions about any "purported or alleged" relationship.

"It's potentially a personally delicate thing, but if the relationship between the deponent of the affidavit and the applicant is anything other than a purely professional relationship, I want to know what that wasn't disclosed," he said.

The judge said he was "surprised" it was left to him to raise the matter.

Mr Moses said he was conscious not to turn the separate case into "a satellite hearing to distract from the substantive [defamation] hearing".

"Female lawyers have enough to deal with in this profession without having those kinds of aspersions being put against them," he said.

Justice Bromwich said he raised the matter "with some anxiety".

"It's not something I find appealing at all, but I have to deal with the cards that are served on me."

Justice Bromwich said the problem was he had exercised power and made orders last week based on "an affidavit where there is at least a basis for a concern there has not been compliance with the duty of utmost good faith and disclosure".

Mr Moses agreed to provide further material to back up the orders.

Ms Allen did not comment as she left the court, but Seven West Media executive Bruce McWilliam denied there was any relationship and said any suggestion in the media to the contrary was a "deplorable slur".

"There's absolutely no truth attached to any of it and it's a very bad way to treat a very talented solicitor who's very good at what she does," he said.

Lawyer Monica Allen did not comment as she left the Federal Court today. (ABC News)

In another hearing in the afternoon, Mr Moses produced a "gossip column" that linked Mr Roberts-Smith and Ms Allen published by the Australian Financial Review, now owned by Nine, this week.

"The applicant and the deponent are not in a relationship, full stop," Mr Moses said.

Mr Moses said the extensive media reports about Wednesday's development had "understandably caused embarrassment and concern to an officer of this court".

Mr Moses said there were "serious issues" about the respondents in the defamation matter conducting an attack on lawyers acting for Mr Roberts-Smith, saying it may constitute contempt of court by seeking to intimidate.

He said it could not be expected that every time a media party writes an article the lawyer concerned needs to attach it to an affidavit.

"That would constitute the potential harassment and belittling of a female practitioner."

Justice Bromwich also raised a separate matter regarding Mr Roberts-Smith's father, former judge Len Roberts-Smith QC, saying he had recognised him from an ABC News report on Monday night.

The judge said seven or eight years ago, he met Len Roberts-Smith as the head of the Defence Abuse Response Taskforce, and while a meeting between the pair was sought it never eventuated.

Justice Bromwich said he saw no reason to justify recusing himself from the proceedings, but Mr Moses told him he will seek instruction on the matter.

The case returns to court next Tuesday.

The defamation trial has been adjourned until Thursday morning.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.