Former president Donald Trump did better in the 2020 U.S. presidential election among Black voters than in 2016. Wouldn’t it pay Republicans to have more Black spokespersons?
I thought that the GOP might be moving in that direction when South Carolina Sen. Tim Scott gave the Republican response to President Joe Biden’s State of the Union address in 2021. Scott said everything his party needed him to say. Now he’s running for president, as are Larry Elder, a Black conservative talk radio host, and two others of Indian descent, Nikki Haley and Vivek Ramaswamy. Scott reminds me of another African American Republican, former Oklahoma U.S. Rep. J.C. Watts.
SEND LETTERS TO: letters@suntimes.com. We want to hear from our readers. To be considered for publication, letters must include your full name, your neighborhood or hometown and a phone number for verification purposes. Letters should be a maximum of approximately 375 words.
We should recognize a possible benefit of this sudden Republican interest in inclusion: a larger, more diverse talent pool of candidates. Youth and diversity could benefit both political parties.
In 1984, Democrats threw a political Hail Mary by choosing Geraldine Ferraro as Walter Mondale’s vice presidential running mate against Ronald Reagan — and lost badly. Democrats lost with Hillary Clinton (electorally) against Trump in 2016. However, six women ran in the 2020 Democratic primaries, with Kamala Harris emerging as Biden’s running mate.
The point is that Democrats seem more willing to encourage, even risk courting women and/or people of color to their cause. You may recall that Democrats selected a Black nominee who won the presidency — twice.
Incidentally, Watts decided not to run for re-election in 2002. That’s odd. Why didn’t Republicans do more to keep him around? Maybe they’ll do better with Scott. Let’s see which party truly embraces inclusion.
Jim Newton, Itasca
Expanded outdoor dining means increased traffic whining
Closing Clark Street to allow restaurants to put tables in the street for outdoor dining was and is a terrible idea. Few things are more important in a big city than facilitating traffic flow on arterial streets. Ald. Brendan Reilly’s survey of 3,000 residents captures the opinions of only one group. What about the thousands of people who have their commutes disrupted by the rerouting of the CTA’s #22 Clark St. bus? Who is asking them what they think?
David A. Schabes, River North
Less product, more waste
We’re not only stuck with “shrinkflation” as highlighted in the Sun-Times earlier this week, but the smaller containers and wrappings adding to our daily recycling and disposal as we attempt to maintain the same volume we’re used to. The public isn’t stupid, so tell the industry we’ll pay more for the status quo. Also, bear in mind that the cost of changes are passed onto us.
Fred J. Wittenberg, Evanston
