Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Hindu
The Hindu
National
The Hindu Bureau

Arbitral Tribunal restrains former member of AIADMK from using domain name with party’s abbreviation in it

An arbitral tribunal, constituted at the instance of the National Internet Exchange of India (NIXI), has concluded that the political party, All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam is popularly known by its abbreviation AIADMK, and hence the party’s former member K.C. Palanisamy cannot continue to use the domain name www.aiadmk.org.in

The tribunal, headed by sole arbitrator Pankaj Garg ordered the transfer of the domain name in favour of the party and restrained the former member from using the same name or any other deceptively similar name. It directed NIXI to take incidental or anciliary actions required for the transfer of the domain name.

The tribunal also imposed costs of ₹50,000 to be paid by the former member to AIADMK, represented by its leader C.Ve. Shanmugam who had been authorised by party general secretary Edappadi K. Palaniswami to lodge a complaint before NIXI since the party’s authorised website was only www.aiadmk.com.

The complainant’s counsel K. Gowtham Kumar and Balaji Srinivasan argued before the tribunal that the use of a deceptively similar username with the extension org.in by the former member had caused great confusion in the minds of people because only that domain name crops up during a search through most search engines.

They wanted NIXI to resolve the issue in terms of the .IN Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (INDRP) and hence, the exchange had constituted an arbitral tribunal with the consent of both parties. The tribunal conducted a detailed inquiry and arrived at the conclusion that the abbreviation AIADMK refers only to the political party.

“The disputed domain name bears the abbreviation AIADMK, which belongs to the complainant party... After considering all the facts and circumstances and the evidence, this tribunal is of the view that an element of bad faith exists and particular domain name is being used in bad faith by the respondent,” it concluded.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.