As the government and the ruling parties discuss Japan's possession of the "capability to attack enemy bases," or the ability to destroy missile launch bases for self-defense, the appropriateness of that term is being called into question.
Ruling coalition partner Komeito has taken a cautious stance on the possession of this capability, concerned in particular that the current term could be interpreted as a "preemptive strike," which could infringe on international law.
"We'd like a different expression to be used," Kazuo Kitagawa, the deputy head of Komeito, said at a press conference on Jan. 27. "The terms 'enemy base' and 'attack' are both inappropriate."
In recent years, it has become possible to fire missiles from mobile launch pads and submarines. Kitagawa also believes that targets are not limited to "enemy bases," as missile attacks are not the only threat.
He further argued that the term "attack" could be misinterpreted as a preemptive strike.
"What's important is not the term but the substance," Kitagawa said. "Our party will discuss the matter thoroughly."
Prime Minister Fumio Kishida has expressed his willingness to proceed with "realistic consideration, without excluding any options, including the so-called enemy base attack capability." He also directly conveyed this intention during a teleconference with U.S. President Joe Biden on Jan. 21.
The Liberal Democratic Party has begun discussions toward specifying possession of the capability in the government's National Security Strategy, which will be revised at the end of the year. The LDP plans to compile a proposal before this summer's House of Councillors election.
Even within the LDP, many members have voiced their desire to change the current expression of "enemy base attack capability."
In its pledges for the House of Representatives election last year, the LDP vowed to work harder to establish a system to enhance the nation's deterrence capabilities, including the possession of the ability to intercept ballistic missiles and other weapons in enemy territory. This stance was based on intraparty discussions held in 2020, when Shinzo Abe was prime minister.
In speeches and on other occasions, LDP Secretary General Toshimitsu Motegi has used the term "counterattack" instead of "attack" when describing this capability.
The LDP has adhered to the government view stated by then Prime Minister Ichiro Hatoyama when responding to questions in the Diet in 1956. Naka Funada, then director general of the Defense Agency, read a statement by Hatoyama saying, "Striking bases [capable of firing] guided missiles and other weapons is possible from a legal standpoint, as it is within the scope of self-defense."
However, as a policy decision, successive governments have not possessed such capability.
Read more from The Japan News at https://japannews.yomiuri.co.jp/
