Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Independent UK
The Independent UK
George Lithgow

Apprentice loses job after threatening colleague for ‘poking holes in sandwiches’

Brooklyn Forrester-Hayes accused a fellow apprentice of tampering with his food - (Getty Images)

A garage apprentice who threatened a colleague over suspicions of “smashing his crisps" and poking "finger-sized holes through his sandwiches" was rightfully dismissed, an employment tribunal has ruled.

Brooklyn Forrester-Hayes, who dreamt of becoming a master technician at the Scania truck depot in Swindon, accused a fellow apprentice of tampering with his food, claiming his crisps had been crushed and "finger-sized holes" poked through his sandwiches.

The tribunal heard that Mr Forrester-Hayes, 21, sent "abusive messages" to his colleague, threatening to damage his toolbox and bike if he didn't confess to the alleged prank.

Despite a workplace culture of "banter" and "pranking" among the five apprentices at the depot – which included interfering with each other's tools – Scania bosses deemed Mr Forrester-Hayes's behaviour unacceptable and dismissed him.

The apprentice subsequently took the company to an employment tribunal, claiming unfair dismissal. However, the tribunal ruled in favour of Scania, concluding that the company was justified in its decision, given the nature of Mr Forrester-Hayes's threats.

The incident occurred in February 2020, when Mr Forrester-Hayes was aged 16 and had recently begun his apprenticeship.

The apprentice was handed a final written warning in 2021, after he angrily reacted to one of his tools getting wrapped in electrical tape by a colleague, the hearing was told.

Mr Forrester-Hayes “grabbed him by the collar and held on to him” before a supervisor intervened, the tribunal was told.

Shortly after starting his shift in July 2023, he went to the tea room for a drink and found that his “lunch bag had been tampered with”, the tribunal heard.

He found his “crisps smashed, chocolate bars crushed and someone had opened his sandwich box and poked finger-sized holes through the sandwiches”.

Brooklyn Forrester-Hayes previously worked as an apprentice technician at the Scania depot in Swindon, Wiltshire (Google Streetview)

They had also opened tea bags and sprinkled tea leaves all over his lunch bag.

Mr Forrester-Hayes said he was “upset, dismayed and angry, and now had no food until he got home”.

He threw the contents of his lunch box in the bin and then went to report the incident, the tribunal heard.

Mr Forrester-Hayes assumed the culprit was an apprentice on the early shift, and told a colleague who was in the tea room: “I am going to f*** him up for it.”

“If I see his f****** toolbox open tomorrow – I’m going to f*** everything up in there,” he added.

Mr Forrester-Hayes sent messages to everyone on the early shift, asking them if they knew who was responsible.

In a Snapchat message to an apprentice he suspected, he said: “If i find out it was u… ur toolbox is f*****.

“If it was u ur paying for my lunch if u dont ill cut ur tyre valves off… simple.”

In an exchange of messages with another colleague, he said the culprit had “f***** up all my food for tonight”.

The colleague replied: “Yeah that’s a bit much I would only do the crisps at worst… not everything.”

Mr Forrester-Hayes told the tribunal his ADHD has the effect of him “saying something impulsively”.

He said at the time he was so impulsive he did not “stop to think about the consequences of the messages to TA”.

The following day, a foreman asked all of the apprentices if they knew what had happened to the lunch.

Nobody owned up, but some mentioned the “abusive messages” the apprentice had been sending.

He was suspended, and after further investigation, he was sacked.

Mr Forrester-Hayes claimed he had been unfairly dismissed because the investigation had been inadequate and that managers did not take his ADHD into account when making their decision.

But the tribunal ruled bosses were entitled to conclude his behaviour was unacceptable and that “dismissal was necessary to protect employees”.

His claims of unfair dismissal, damages for breach of contract, disability discrimination, failure to make reasonable adjustments and harassment related to disability failed.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.