
What have we dung to our beaches, America? Passed in 1972, the Clean Water Act set the goal of all waterways in the U.S. being safe for swimming. However, 46 years later, a new report entitled “Safe for Swimming? Water Quality at Our Beaches” showed just how poopy a job our country has done in striving for this goal. The report revealed that over half of the 4,523 beaches tested in 2018 “ had potentially unsafe levels of fecal contamination on at least a day.”
Not just contamination. But fecal or poop contamination. And not just fecal contamination. But potentially unsafe levels of fecal contamination. If this turns your resting beach face into a look of disgust, you may be justified.
As you can imagine, poop in the water is not good. The only time poop in the water is good is if it is in a toilet bowl and you are not inside the toilet bowl. Poop contains lots of bacteria. Some of this bacteria can make you sick like certain strains of Enterococcus and E. coli.
The analysis in the report defined “potentially unsafe levels” as poop bacterial as levels exceeding the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Beach Action Value (BAV) threshold. The BAV threshold represents the poop bacteria levels at which approximately 32 out of every 1,000 swimmers would get sick. This varies depending on the type of poop bacteria. For example, for Enterococcus, this BAV threshold would be 60 colony-forming units per 100 milliliters (cfu/100mL), and for the bacteria E. coli 190 cfu/100mL. Of course, swimming in water that exceeds these thresholds doesn’t necessarily mean that you will get sick but the odds of getting sick increase with increasing amounts of bacteria. Over 13 percent (or 605) of the beaches had levels that went beyond such thresholds in at least 25 percent of the days that samples were collected and tested.
If you think that simply staying away from dirty beaches and sticking to clean ones is the answer, just hold on, in the words of Wilson Phillips. First, take a look at the breakdown by region:
Region | Beaches Tested | Beaches Potentially Unsafe (> 1 day) |
% |
Gulf Coast | 385 | 329 | 85 |
Great Lakes | 558 | 418 | 75 |
West Coast | 850 | 573 | 67 |
East Coast | 2,373 | 1,134 | 48 |
Total | 4523 | 2,620 | 58 |
None of the regions came out looking particularly clean. Then there’s this breakdown of beach sites tested and the number that may be potentially unsafe for at least one day by State and Puerto Rico:
State | Beaches Tested | Beaches Potentially Unsafe (> 1 day) | Beach with Most Potentially Unsafe Days | Number of Unsafe Potentially Days |
Alabama | 25 | 21 | Fairhope Public Beach in Baldwin County | 21 |
California | 584 | 466 | Inner Cabrillo Beach in Los Angeles County |
85 |
Connecticut | 113 | 81 | Byram Beach in Fairfield County | 6 |
Delaware | 23 | 7 | Slaughter Beach in Sussex County | 16 |
Florida | 263 | 180 | Bayou Texar in Escambia County | 24 |
Georgia | 26 | 13 | St. Simons Island Lighthouse in Glynn County |
6 |
Hawaii | 218 | 90 | Keehi Lagoon (North) in Honolulu County |
11 |
Illinois | 19 | 19 | South Shore Beach in Cook County |
38 |
Indiana | 23 | 22 | Jeorse Park Beach in Lake County | 40 |
Louisiana | 24 | 24 | North Beach in Calcasieu Parish | 11 |
Maine | 85 | 39 | Goose Rocks Beach in York County | 14 |
Maryland | 158 | 79 | Camp Pecometh in Kent County | 9 |
Massachusetts | 583 | 223 | Nahant Bay at Eastern Ave. in Essex County |
39 |
Michigan | 207 | 120 | St. Clair Shores Memorial Park Beach in Macomb County |
26 |
Minnesota | 42 | 25 | New Duluth Boat Club landing facility in St. Louis County |
16 |
Mississippi | 21 | 21 | Gulfport East Beach in Harrison County |
44 |
New Hampshire | 47 | 15 | State Beach in Rockingham County | 5 |
New Jersey | 356 | 133 | Beachwood Beach West in Ocean County |
14 |
New York | 422 | 276 | Tanner Park in Suffolk County | 48 |
North Carolina | 213 | 127 | Intersection of E. Main St. and Tooley St., Belhaven in Beaufort County |
11 |
Ohio | 58 | 56 | Bay View West in Erie County | 48 |
Oregon | 51 | 18 | Sunset Bay State Park Beach at mouth of Big Creek in Coos County |
11 |
Pennsylvania | 28 | 27 | Beach 11 in Thompson Bay in Erie County |
17 |
Puerto Rico | 139 | 76 | Playa Guayanes, Yabucoa in Yabucoa Municipio |
16 |
Rhode Island | 129 | 54 | Easton’s Beach in Newport County | 10 |
South Carolina | 122 | 55 | Withers Swash in Horry County |
32 |
Texas | 167 | 141 | Cole Park in Nueces County | 52 |
Virginia | 37 | 19 | North Community Beach in Norfolk City |
7 |
Washington | 215 | 89 | Sooes Beach in Clallam County | 7 |
Wisconsin | 125 | 104 | Cupertino Park in Milwaukee County |
40 |
Of the 29 states listed here, only a few did not have a majority of beaches tested with at least one potentially unsafe day. Delaware, yes Delaware, had the lowest percentage. But you still may want to think twice about going to a place named Slaughter Beach.
What’s going on here? Are people just taking lots of dumps in the water? Sort of, indirectly. The fecal contamination is coming from sewage and waste materials being dumped into the water. As the report indicated, the primary sources are, “urban runoff, sewage leaks and overflows, and industrial-scale livestock operations.”
Urban runoff is not people with bad diarrhea sprinting in cities to find bathrooms. Instead, it’s when rainwater or melting snow can’t seep into the ground because of pavement and buildings and instead “runs off” to lakes, oceans, and other bodies of water. This water then carries various pollutants such as stuff from cars and factories and, yes, poop with it into the bodies of water.

All of this can be bad for your health. If someone needs to tell you that swimming in poop is not good, then please don’t invite me over for a pool party. In the short term, water contamination can cause reactions or infections in various body parts including your skin, your eyes, and your gastrointestinal tract. A study published in the journal Environmental Health found that around 90 million water recreation-related illnesses occur in the U.S. each year, costing $2.2 to $3.7 billion annually. Over the long term, who knows how chronic exposure to such contamination could increase your risk of different chronic diseases such as obesity, diabetes, heart disease, and cancer. Moreover, continuing to flush junk into our waterways can disrupt the animals and plants that live (or in some cases used to live) in the lakes and oceans, which in turn affects your diet and thus your health. Yes, everything is connected in a system. So even though you don’t have pipes that directly connect your toilet with your refrigerator, pollution and inadequate sewage systems and waste disposal may in effect be doing so.
It’s time to take water pollution more seriously and stop treating our bodies of water like giant toilet bowls. One thing that you can do is push for at least some of the changes recommended by the report. For example, increasing and improving green infrastructure would allow better absorption of rainwater and melting snow and reduce the run-off that is occurring. Also, our aging sewage and water monitoring systems are long-overdue for updating and improvements. Then, there’s the manure issue. Livestock will keep producing it, so you can’t just tell them to stop it. Rather, there needs to be better ways to reduce manure pollution such as keeping the poop away from croplands and other areas and perhaps even halting expansion of the livestock industry. Finally, the report advocated for more regular testing and monitoring of beach pollution and contamination and posting warnings on beaches when conditions become potentially unsafe.
As a reminder, this report focused only on the bacteria found in poop and not all the other pathogens such as viruses, chemicals, trash, and other pollutants being discarded into the lakes and oceans. Thus, just because the bacterial counts are below BAV thresholds doesn’t mean that the water is completely safe. As with all things in life, poop is not the only thing that should concern you.