Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Top News
Top News

AI Outperforms Human Doctors In Detecting Ovarian Cancer

AI tech with smart Features.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is proving to be a potential life-saving tool for the nearly 20,000 women in the U.S. who are diagnosed with ovarian cancer each year. A recent study led by researchers at Karolinska Institutet in Sweden revealed that AI models outperformed human doctors in detecting ovarian cancer.

The study, published in Nature Medicine, tested an AI model's ability to differentiate between benign and malignant lesions on the ovaries. The AI model was trained on over 17,000 ultrasound images from 3,652 patients across 20 hospitals in eight countries.

The AI model achieved an impressive accuracy rate of 86% in detecting ovarian cancer, surpassing the 82% accuracy rate of human experts and the 77% accuracy rate of less experienced individuals.

AI trained on 17,000 ultrasound images from 20 hospitals across 8 countries.
AI model achieved 86% accuracy in detecting ovarian cancer.
AI surpassed human experts' accuracy rate of 82% in detecting ovarian cancer.

According to study author Elisabeth Epstein, a professor at Karolinska Institutet, ovarian tumors are often detected incidentally, highlighting the importance of accurate diagnostics. AI-driven diagnostic support can significantly enhance triage efficiency, reduce diagnostic errors, and address the shortage of expert examiners, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes.

Dr. Brian Slomovitz, a gynecologic oncology expert, emphasized the importance of early detection in reducing ovarian cancer-related deaths. While AI shows promise in improving cancer diagnostics, limitations such as data bias and regulatory concerns need to be addressed.

Dr. Harvey Castro, an emergency medicine physician, highlighted the need for additional research to assess AI's real-world adaptability, long-term impact on healthcare costs and outcomes, and its effectiveness across diverse populations and clinical settings.

The researchers acknowledged the study's limitations and emphasized that AI should be used as a diagnostic support tool, not a replacement for human physicians. Clinical studies are planned to further evaluate AI's performance in real clinical settings.

Collaborating with the KTH Royal Institute of Technology, the research was funded by various organizations, including the Swedish Research Council and the Swedish Cancer Society.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.