Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
Politics
Andrew Sparrow

UK politics: I never called for rainbow lanyard ban, claims Esther McVey – as it happened

Chris Philp Theresa May United Kingdom Neil Henderson Emma Barnett Richard Adams ​​Rishi Sunak Police
Esther McVey had said civil servants should leave their political views ‘at the building entrance’.
Esther McVey had said civil servants should leave their political views ‘at the building entrance’. Photograph: Wiktor Szymanowicz/REX/Shutterstock

We are now closing this blog but you can read all our UK politics coverage here.

Early evening summary

  • Keir Starmer accused Rishi Sunak of using the early release scheme to give dangerous prisoners “get-out-of-jail” cards at PMQs. In response, Sunak claimed dangerous prisoners were not being let out – even though Starmer was able to quote from a report saying this is exactly what has happened at Lewes prison. (See 1.29pm.)

  • Esther McVey, the Cabinet Office minister, has claimed that she never proposed a ban on civil servants wearing rainbow lanyards in her speech on Monday. (See 5.12pm.)

Updated

MPs set to vote to make cuckooing specific criminal offence

MPs have been debating amendments to the criminal justice bill, and will vote on some of them later. It has been a rather rambling debate, mainly because the list of amendments is enormous. It runs to 183 pages, and more than 150 amendments are from the government.

One of the amendments will make cuckooing a specific offence. This is when criminals take over a vulnerable person’s home and use it for illicit purposes, such as drug dealing or prostititution. Offenders will face a fine, or a jail sentence of up to five years.

Welcoming the government amendment on this, the shadow justice minister Alex Cunningham said:

As has been clear in the committee discussion of cuckooing, the level of harm caused by cuckooing is very substantial.”

Cuckooing is a terrifying experience for the vulnerable adults targeted by these criminals.

I do not think that any of us can comprehend what it would mean to have our home taken over in such a way.

Starmer fails to fully win over Labour MP Rosie Duffield after chat intended to settle long-running grievance

As Sam Lister reports in a story for the Daily Express, Keir Starmer has had a conversation with Rosie Duffield, the Labour MP for Canterbury who has complained about being in effect ostracised by the party, and ignored by the leadership, because she is a vocal gender critical feminist who has spoken out against the pro-trans views held by many or most of her colleagues. Lister describes it as peace talks after three years of being cold shouldered.

Judging by Duffield’s response, in terms of making up, there is still some way to go.

Not quite true. I told a whip that I had not been spoken to for 2.5yrs when Natalie Elphicke was welcomed with open arms. I got 17 minutes and still no apology for being briefed against by Head of Comms or investigated for 12 months....!

UPDATE: My colleague Jessica Elgot writes:

Duffield faced public criticism and was censured by LGBT Labour after saying only women could have a cervix and campaigning with activists critical of changes to trans rights, which led to party calls for Starmer to remove the whip from Duffield.

But in the wake of the Cass Review into Gender Identity, Starmer has said he now believes Duffield “biologically, she of course is right” he said, having previously said it was “something that shouldn’t be said.”

The MP said it was the first time she had seen Starmer in almost three years, having complained to Labour whips that she had never received a response to requests to see Starmer and had been annoyed by how he had received Elphicke, the former Tory MP for Dover.

Updated

Esther McVey claims she never proposed ban on rainbow lanyards for civil servants (even though she did)

Esther McVey, the Cabinet Office minister, has claimed that she never proposed a “ban'” on civil servants wearing rainbow lanyards, or other ones conveying a political message, in her speech on Monday. The idea has been much ridiculed, and dropped by No 10.

Only – she did say she wanted to ban rainbow lanyards, even if she did not use the word. In her speech she said:

I want a very simple but visible change to occur too – the lanyards worn to carry security passes shouldn’t be a random pick and mix, they should be a standard design reflecting that we are all members of the government delivering for the citizens of the UK.

She also elaborated on this in her Q&A.

Labour demands assurances from Czech billionaire bidding for Royal Mail, saying it will take 'necessary steps' to keep it British

As Alex Lawson reports, International Distributions Services (IDS), the owner of Royal Mail, has accepted a £3.5bn bid for the postal company from Daniel Křetínský, a Czech billionaire, after he ramped up the value of the takeover.

In a fascinating move, the Labour party has written to Křetínský demanding certain assurances if the takeover goes ahead. In an open letter Jonathan Reynolds, the shadow business secretary, says:

While I recognise that a takeover by EP Group is far from complete, with positive reports of progress towards a deal emerging in the media, I write to ask whether you would offer myself and the Labour party commitments to undertaking certain safeguards should a takeover be completed.

Firstly, the Royal Mail is a national asset and its ability to use the royal cypher of HRH King Charles III is an important symbol of its unique place in British life and the value British people rightly place in it. Taking IDS into private ownership risks seeing the company be operated overseas, something which the Labour party would never accept. As such, can you confirm that, should EP Group complete a takeover of IDS, the Royal Mail would continue to be headquartered in the UK and remain tax resident in the UK?

Secondly, the Labour party believes that Royal Mail staff are essential workers that offer great social value to our communities. Postal workers are Royal Mail’s greatest asset, can you confirm, should this deal go through, that you will work closely with the Communication Workers Union to build a sustainable Royal Mail?

Finally, Labour is committed to the universal service obligation (USO) as Royal Mail’s central mission. We believe the USO underpins our postal service and the enormous value it has for communities and businesses as well as being an important foundation of the union. In that spirit, can you confirm EP Group’s commitment to the USO and that it would be your intention for Royal to remain the universal service provider.

Whilst it’s important that Britain remains open and attractive to foreign investment, Royal Mail is an iconic British institution with a unique place in our society and infrastructure. Royal Mail is as British as it gets, and Labour will take the necessary steps to safeguard its undeniable identity and place in public life. Given the importance of the matter, I would be grateful if you would consider these issues as a matter of urgency. I look forward to hearing from you.

Alert readers will remember that Reynolds is not the actual business secretary, Labour is not in power and in theory in Reynolds is in no position to dictate terms to anyone involved in a corporate takeover. In reality, though, power starts to transfer well before a general election (especially if you have an opinion poll lead like Labour’s) and this reads like an intervention with clout.

Updated

Bar Council says 'chronic lack of investment' to blame for court hearings being delayed, not lawyers' strike as MoJ claimed

The Bar Council has criticised the Ministry of Justice for seeming to blame the strike by criminal defence barristers in 2022 for overcrowding in prisons.

In a statement given to the media about today’s decision to delay some court hearings because of the overcrowding crisis (see 10.39am), the MoJ said: “We continue to see pressure on our prisons following the impact of the pandemic and barristers’ strike which is why we have initiated a previously used measure to securely transfer prisoners between courts and custody and ensure there is always a custody cell available should they be remanded.”

In response, Sam Townend KC, chair of the Bar Council, said:

To blame the Bar for this, as the Ministry of Justice’s statement seems to, is wrong. Covid and the criminal Bar action happened in the past. It is how you respond to it that is the test for government.

Townend also said “chronic lack of investment” in the criminal justice system was to blame. He said:

Operation Early Dawn is just one symptom of the chronic lack of investment in the criminal justice system for so long, along with up to 70-day early release of prisoners, the average time to trial now at a year, and the backlogs worsening.

We cannot continue like this.

With reducing numbers of guilty pleas and victims of crime giving up on criminal cases, the government must now show that it takes criminal justice seriously. Real and sustained investment in prisons, courts, judges, solicitors and barristers is needed and now, otherwise these emergency measures will just precipitate more.

Townend is a former Labour parliamentary candidate.

Minister says it's too soon to say small boat arrivals in 2024 will be higher than in 2023 - even though currently they're a third up

Joanna Cherry told Michael Tomlinson small boat arrival numbers were going up. (Recent figures show they are about a third higher than they were at the same point last year.)

Q: Doesn’t that prove the Rwanda policy is not working as a deterrent?

Tomlinson started to talk about Albania. Cherry said she would accept that the Albanian scheme had been a success, but she wanted him to address the point.

Tomlinson started by saying we are “early on in the year”. He said it was too soon to say that the arrival numbers for 2024 would be higher than last year.

He said the experience in Ireland showed the Rwanda policy was having a deterrent effect.

And he said, once the scheme was operationalised, the full deterrent effect would kick in.

Q: Even if you are can get 2,000 people to Rwanda, what will happen to the other 90,000 or so asylum seekers who are here but who cannot apply for asylum?

Tomlinson said the Rwanda scheme was uncapped.

And he said 26,000 people returned to their home country last year.

Updated

At the joint committee on human rights Helena Kennedy, the Labour peer and KC, asked what would happen if the European court of human rights were to issue an injunction blocking a deportation to Rwanda, on the ground that the person was at risk of irreperable harm. Would a minister ignore the court? Or would they deport the person anyway?

Michael Tomlinson, the illegal migration minister, said the ECHR has recently tightened the conditions in which an injunction might be granted.

He gave a long, waffly answer, which did not directly answer the question.

Q: But what will you do if there is an injunction?

Tomlinson said he would look at it on a case by case basis.

Joanna Cherry said he was saying he would retain the right to ignore the court.

Q: As a lawyer, are you not unhappy about the idea that you might defy a court?

Not at all, Tomlinson said. He said, in deciding on the merits of the case, he would be following the procedure laid out in the Safety of Rwanda Act.

Michael Tomlinson, the illegal migration minister, is giving evidence to the joint committee on human rights.

Joanna Cherry, the SNP chair of the committee, asked him if the government would respect the Belfast high court ruling on Monday saying the Rwanda deportation policy could not apply in Northern Ireland.

Tomlinson said the court judgment was only the first stage of the process. The government would appeal, he confirmed. While the judgment stood, the government would respect it, he said.

But he said the judgment applied to the Illegal Migration Act, parts of which are not yet in force anyway, he said.

And he said the flights to Rwanda would go ahead. He said they were not being authorised under the Illegal Migration Act. They were taking place under the Nationality and Borders Act, and under the Safety of Rwanda Act, both of which were not covered by the Belfast judgment.

The National Education Union has said there are “many areas of concern” in the new rules the government is reportedly planning to set for sex education in English schools. Daniel Kebede, the union’s general secretary, said:

Education about sex and about positive relationships is important, and it is vital for it to be delivered in an age-appropriate and phase-appropriate way. The government appears to be seeding doubts that this is not already being done and thought about carefully by school leaders and teachers up and down the land. This is yet more culture war noise from an ill-informed and out of touch government.

Schools need clear and constructive support about how to respond to the issues children and young people face, read about online and chat about in the playground. Primary-aged children pick up information online and need the opportunity to discuss puberty and relationships and their bodies with trusted adults.

Issues such as domestic violence can affect children from a young age and it is irresponsible to shut this conversation out until teenage years. We must also challenge widespread patterns like sexual bullying and homophobic bullying which start in primary, and all children must have the language to help them make disclosures where needed.

Labour has said that it would like to end the government’s early release scheme for prisoners if it wins the election, although it has admitted this would not be easy, and not given a firm pledge. A Labour party spokesperson told journalists:

Of course we would want to end this policy as soon as possible but as I say, the honest answer is that we are under no illusion about the scale of the challenge we will face when it comes to the prison capacity crisis that we will inherit, should we be privileged enough to win the next election.

But it isn’t right. In fact, it is an injustice to see prisoners being released from prison earlier than an independent court has intended simply because there isn’t the estate space for them.

Labour says Sunak was misleading MPs when he said dangerous prisoners not included in early release scheme

Labour says Rishi Sunak was being misleading at PMQs when he said dangerous prisoners were not included in the early release scheme. (See 1.29pm and 2.25pm.) At his post-PMQs briefing, a Labour spokesperson said:

It is clear from the inspector’s reports that [Sunak’s] statement was misleading given the evidence that we have seen of what is happening.

I am sure that the prime minister would never want to do that and would want to look to correct the record as soon as he can.

As PA Media reports, the spokesperson also said it was “factually inaccurate” to suggest the last Labour government’s early release scheme had led to the release of some of the most serious offenders. The Labour scheme, he said, only released people when they had 18 days of their sentence to go, and had exclusions for sex offences, serious violence, and those awaiting extradition.

Updated

No 10 defends making jail sentences longer while prisoners being released early, saying policies 'two sides of same coin'

The post-PMQs lobby briefing was mostly taken up with questions about prisons. Here are the main points.

  • No 10 rejected suggestions that Rishi Sunak misled MPs at PMQs when he said dangerous prisoners were not getting out under the government’s early release scheme. (The No 10 argument seemed to be that Sunak was setting out what the policy should be, but it was not entirely clear. No 10 did not say that the report from the Chief Inspector of Prisons saying dangerous prisoners have been released early from Lewes prison was wrong.) Asked if Sunak was misleading the Commons, the PM’s spokesperson said: “I do reject that.”

  • The spokesperson rejected suggestions that Sunak was trying to “pass the buck” to prisoner governors. At PMQs Sunak said that prison governors had a “lock” that allowed them to veto the early release of any prisoner they considered dangerous. The spokesperson said he did not accept this was buck passing, but he defended the system. He explained:

Prison governors and the probation service have a veto which we fully expect them to use to block any offender moving onto licence before their release date if they could pose an increased risk to the public.

Governors are obviously best placed to take these individual judgments in combination with the probation service, but they have a specific veto on top of the automatic exclusion that will apply to anyone who is convicted of a sexual, terrorist or serious violent offence.

  • The spokesperson said it was wrong to say the prisons in England are full. “This is an existing operation that is used from time to time to manage immediate localised pressures on the prison estate,” he said.

  • The spokesperson defended the government’s policy of making prison sentences longer while also letting inmates out early because the jail are at or near capacity. The criminal justice bill being debated by MPs this afternoon will introduce tougher sentences for sexual and violent offenders. The impact assessment for the bill says this will require new prison places to be built at a cost of £31m, and that ongoing extra prison costs will run to £36m over 10 years. But the spokesperson rejected suggestions it was pointless increasing sentences while at the same time letting offenders out early. He said:

These are two sides of the same coin … We are taking action to lock up the worst offenders for longer and in order to ensure that we can put the worst offenders away for longer we must make sure that there are sufficient spaces to lock up the most dangerous criminals.

Not everyone seems convinced. This is from Jason Groves, the Daily Mail’s political editor.

No 10 confirms it will press ahead with the Sentencing Bill, which brings in longer sentences for serious crimes, while simultaneously releasing people early from existing sentences because the prisons are full

Updated

Starmer says government's early release scheme has given 'get-out-of-jail' cards to dangerous prisoners

Here is the PA Media story from PMQs.

Keir Starmer has urged Rishi Sunak to stop trying to issue “get-out-of-jail” cards to criminals, as he compared the prime minister to a “jumped-up milk monitor”.

The Labour leader used PMQs to press Sunak for assurances that domestic abusers and other serious offenders would not be freed from jail early as part of a government bid to cut overcrowding.

Starmer said Sunak should focus on the “chaos” facing prisons instead of “colourful lanyards”, a nod to suggestions from a minister over a ban on civil servants wearing rainbow lanyards.

The government has insisted the early release measure would be temporary and would only allow “low-level offenders” out of prison up to 18 days early under strict supervision.

It has since emerged that ministers were preparing to extend the scheme for a second time so some criminals could be freed from jail up to 70 days before their release date.

Starmer, who mocked Sunak for launching “version 7.0” of himself earlier this week, said: “Does the early release of stalkers, domestic abusers and those considered a risk to children sound like the work of someone who is making the country more secure?”

Sunak replied: “No-one should be put on this scheme if they are a threat to the public. And let me be crystal clear, it does not apply to anyone serving a life sentence, anyone convicted of a serious violent offence, anyone convicted of terrorism, anyone convicted of a sex offence and, crucially, in contrast to the system Labour put in place, governors in the prison service have an absolute lock so that no-one is put on the scheme who shouldn’t be.”

Sunak went on to criticise the efforts of previous Labour governments, with Starmer countering: “I’m glad to hear those on life sentences aren’t being released early. He may not think that releasing domestic abusers is a problem but Labour has repeatedly called for domestic abusers to be exempt from his scheme to release prisoners early. His government has shamefully ignored those calls.”

Sunak repeated there is an “absolute governor lock” on who is put on the scheme before defending the government’s approach and claiming a Labour frontbencher believes “prison doesn’t prevent crime”. He added: “It’s always the same with the Labour party, soft on crime and soft on criminals.”

Starmer said: “He’s literally letting criminals out early and the only answer to the question I asked – whether domestic abusers should be exempt from his early release scheme, from anyone serious about security – is yes.

“Perhaps the most ludicrous part of the prime minister’s speech on Monday was when he said he won’t accept the idea that any of the problems people are facing are caused by the 14 years of Conservative government.

“He won’t say how many prisoners they’ve released early, he won’t say if they’re burglars, abusers or stalkers. He won’t say where they are or what support their victims are getting. Yet he thinks he has the right to tell people they can’t blame his government for any of it.

“Doesn’t he think that rather than confiscating lanyards like some jumped-up milk monitor he should stop issuing ‘get out of jail free cards’ to prisoners considered a risk to children?”

Sunak replied: “Another week with no ideas and absolutely no plan for the country. They’ve had 14 years to think about nothing but the future, but all they can do is talk about the past.”

Updated

PMQs - snap verdict

There are many ways of judging who has peformed best at PMQs, but two of the most reliable are: who had the best soundbite, and who made the best argument? On both counts, Keir Starmer (as is usual these days) was comfortably ahead.

Soundbites matter because they are the bits most likely to be clipped for the TV news, and Starmer’s best one came in his final question.

[Rishi Sunak] won’t say how many prisoners they’ve released early. He won’t say if they’re burglars, abusers or stalkers. He won’t say where they are, or what support the victims are getting. Yet he thinks he has the right to tell people they can’t blame his government for any of it.

Doesn’t he think that, rather than confiscating lanyards like some jumped-up milk monitor, he should stop issuing get-out-of-jail cards free to prisoners considered a risk to children?

Assuming you are old enough to know what a milk monitor is or was, this is good: funny, scathing, neatly juxtaposing two of the stories of the week, and implying a commitment of sorts (to stop the early release of prisoners deemed a risk to the public). TV producers trying to select the best Sunak clip are going to have a harder job. He delivered some polished, punchy lines attacking Labour’s voting record on tougher sentences, and anti-Trident votes by Angela Rayner and David Lammy (eight years ago), but these are ancient CCHQ talking points, and (unlike Starmer) Sunak could not manage humour.

A better measure is to ask who won the argument. Sunak used PMQs to focus on Labour’s refusal to give a firm commitment to raising defence spending to 2.5% of GDP. But he is finding it hard to make this one fly, because Starmer can say, as he did, “I was the first to call for 2.5% on defence spending” and then you need to have more than a casual grasp of how public spending works to understand that there is a difference (real, but not huge) between an aspiration to hit 2.5% (Labour’s position) and a (slightly sketchy) plan to get there by 2030 (the Tories’).

Starmer, by contrast, had a PMQs plan, laid a trap, and then watched Sunak walk right into it. After twice getting Sunak to give an assurance that criminals considered threat to the public aren’t getting out as a result of the early prisoner release scheme implemented to deal with jail overcrowding, he then confronted Sunak with the evidence that, in fact, this is happening. Asked to respond to quotes from a report on Lewes prison that contradicted what he had just told MPs, Sunak resorted to saying that that shouldn’t happen, and that it was worse when Labour was in power. Neither of those are reassuring answers.

The Lewes prison report did not attract much attention when it came out earlier this week (although Rajeev Syal wrote it up for us here.). But Starmer has now plonked the incriminating evidence on the record. Helpfully, he even gave us the page references. This is from page 5.

Under the end of custody supervised licence scheme, some high-risk prisoners were being released at short notice without sufficient risk management planning.

And this is from page 46.

In one case, a high-risk prisoner had his release date brought forward under the ECSL scheme, despite having a history of stalking, domestic abuse and being subject to a restraining order. He was a risk to children and subject to an exclusion zone that included the local authority responsible for trying to house him.

Job done.

Updated

Nadia Whittome (Lab) says rape has been effectively decriminalised because charging rates are so low. Just 2.5% of rapes recorded last year led to a charge, she says.

Sunak does not accept this description. He says the government has ensured rape is treated more seriously.

Violence against women and girls is now a strategic policing requirement … We’ve actually quadrupled funding for Victim Support, with more independent domestic sexual violence advisers. There’s a new 24/7 support for victims. We’ve ended the digital strip search, provided pre trial cross examination, all of which by the way, has meant an improvement in the process, and we have seen an increase in the average sentence by a third since Labour was last in office.

And that was the final question.

Theo Clarke (Con) asks Sunak if he will fully back the recommendations in report from the all-party parliamentary group on birth trauma.

Sunak says the government fully supports “the overarching recommendation for a comprehensive national strategy to improve maternity services”.

Helen Morgan (Lib Dem) says members of the armed forces have been told that requests for repairs to the homes they live in are not affordable. When will the government ensure they get decent property?

Sunak says 96% of service home meet decent standards. Where complaints are made, they are addressed. The Tories are the only party committed to increasing defence spending, he says.

Mary Glindon (Lab) asks about schools with structural problems in her North Tyneside constituency. Will they get help from central government?

Sunak says the goverment helped schools with Raac (crumbly concrete). He says the Department for Education will have heard Glindon’s point.

Derek Thomas (Con) asks about community pharmacies.

Sunak says he cares deeeply about pharmacies. (His mum ran one.) The government has given them new prescribing powers, he says.

Rebecca Long-Bailey (Lab) asks about the ombudsman’s report saying the Waspi women (Women Against State Pension Injustice – women saying they lost out because they were not properly warned about the rise in their pension age) should get compensation. When will that happen?

Sunak says the government is still considering this. And he says he will take into account what is said in the debate tomorrow.

Rosena Allin-Khan (Lab) asks Sunak why he is allowing Israel to get away with trampling over humanitarian law.

Sunak says he supports Israel’s right to defend itself. And he says he has repeatedly urged Israel to allow more aid into Gaza.

Alberto Costa (Con) says the chld killer Colin Pitchfork is making another attempt to get parole. He says the rules allow convicts to make repeated attempts to get parole. That should stop, he says.

Sunak commends Costa for his campaigning on this and says he will arrange for him to have a meeting with ministers to discuss this.

Updated

Wendy Chamberlain (Lib Dem) asks about the closure of a TSB branch in her North East Fife constituency. What will the government do to tackle banking deserts?

Sunak says the government legislated to protect access to banking services.

Richard Burgon (Lab) asks what needs to happen for the UK to end arms sales to Israel, as other countries are doing.

Sunak says the UK government does not directly sell arms to Israel. And it has a strict arms control regime, he says.

Updated

What Sunak says about Scottish nationalists in his speech on Monday

For the record, here is the passage in Sunak’s speech on Monday that the SNP claim amounts to equating Scottish nationalists with extremists and autocrats.

Iranian proxies are firing on British ships in the Red Sea, disrupting goods destined for our high streets. Here at home, China has conducted cyber targeting of our democratically elected MPs. Russia has poisoned people with chemical weapons. And when Putin cut off the gas supplies it had a devastating impact on people’s lives and threatened our energy security.

And in this world of greater conflict and danger, 100 million people are now displaced globally. Countries like Russia are weaponising immigration for their own ends, and criminal gangs keep finding new routes across European borders. Illegal migration is placing an intolerable strain on our security and our sense of fairness, and unless we act now and act boldly this problem is only going to grow.

Extremists are also exploiting these global conflicts to divide us. People are abusing our liberal democratic values – the freedom of speech and right of protest - to intimidate, threaten and assault others, to sing antisemitic chants on our streets and our university campuses, and to weaponise the evils of antisemitism or anti-Muslim hatred in a divisive, ideological attempt to set Briton against Briton.

And from gender activists hijacking children’s sex education to cancel culture, vocal and aggressive fringe groups are trying to impose their views on the rest of us. They’re trying to make it morally unacceptable to believe something different and undermine people’s confidence and pride in our own history and identity. Scottish nationalists are even trying to tear our United Kingdom apart.

Updated

Stephen Flynn, the SNP leader at Westminster, says Sunak compared North Korea, Iran and Russia to supporters of Scottish independence in his speech on Monday. Will he apologise for those puerile remarks?

Sunak says that is not what he said. But he says the SNP are a threat to the unity of the UK. That is their purpose, he says.

Flynn says Sunak did not just equate the SNP to despots across the world; he proactively compared half of Scots to Putin. Sunak represents Scots on the world stage. Is this really how Sunak wants to be remembered?

Sunak says the SNP’s obsession with independence means Scottish pupils are being let down. And Scotland is the only place where NHS spending is falling.

Starmer says the only answer to the question, should domestic abusers being stopped from being released early, is yes. He says the most ridiculous part of Sunak’s speech was where he said the Tories should not be blamed for what has happened over the last 14 years. He says, instead of confiscating lanywards “like some jumped-up milk monitor”, Sunak should be stopping domestic abuser being released early.

Sunak says Starmer has no plan, and he says Starmer did not acknowledge the growth figures out last week. The ONS said the economy was going “gangbusters”, he said.

Starmer says the Lewes report shows domestic abusers are being released early. Will the PM back Labour’s calls to stop this.

Sunak says, when Labour was in power, thousands of violent offenders were let out early. He claims one Labour frontbencher said prison did not stop crime.

Starmer says the latest report on Lewes prison says high risk prisoners are being released early, including one deemed a risk to children. Does that sound like the work of someone making the country more secure?

Sunak says no one should be put on this scheme if they are a threat to the public. It does not apply to people serving life sentences, or to anyone convicted of serious violent or sexual offenders.

Starmer tries the question about prisoners again. Are any of the ones being let our early considered to be high risk?

Sunak says no one will be put on the scheme if they are considered a risk to the public. And Starmer voted against tougher sentences for violent prisoners, he says.

Starmer says Sunak is not giving any information on prisoners being released early. How many are there? What crimes have they committed? Can Sunak assure that none of the prisoners being released early are of high risk?

Sunak says prisoners won’t be released early if they are a risk.

And he says, although Starmer claims to be in favour of raising defence spending to 2.5%, he does not have a plan to get there.

Updated

Keir Starmer starts by saying, on the day Sunak said the Tories would protect Britain, Esther McVey launched a crackdown “on the gravest of threats”, colourful lanyards. And will delayed court hearings make people more safe?

Sunak says civil service impartiality is important, as Sue Gray’s move to Labour shows.

And he says some Labour shadow ministers voted against renewing Trident.

Jonathan Lord (Con) asks about concerns about a building plan in his Woking constituency. Does the PM agree that Labour’s plan to concrete over the green belt would be a calamity?

Sunak says Lord is absolutely right. Labour and the Lib Dems both believe in top-down targets “that would decimate the green belt”, he claims.

Rishi Sunak starts with the usual spiel about having meetings with colleagues.

Mikey Smith from the Mirror posted this on X earlier.

In the Commons Labour MPs are taking his advice.

According to the Financial Times, staff working for the Labour party have been told that they will now be allowed to take some holiday. Last week the paper said many of them were knackered because of what one of them described as a “North Korean style” ban, imposed because Labour strategists were worried about a snap election. The story seems to have prompted a rethink and today Jim Pickard and Rafe Uddin report:

Labour has relaxed its restrictions on staff members taking holiday in a tacit admission that the UK’s main opposition party no longer believes a general election will be held before the August break …

In a memo to staff dated December, the leadership said they should avoid taking more than two consecutive days of leave, although the party still allowed for individual circumstances and summer holidays.

Staffers were also told to anticipate six-day working weeks during the final six weeks of the “short campaign” of the election. In fresh guidance, issued at the start of this week, staff were told that this approach has been loosened, according to several party employees.

Sunak faces Starmer at PMQs

Rishi Sunak is facing Keir Starmer at PMQs in half an hour. Last week Sunak was upended at PMQs by the defection of Natalie Elphicke, and so at least this week, assuming he does not lose another Tory MP between now and noon, he should start from a slightly stronger position.

Here is the list of MPs down to ask a question.

Labour says MoJ's decision to hold up court hearings shows people 'less safe' under Tories

Labour says the Ministry of Justice’s decision to delay court hearings because of prison overcrowing (see 10.39am) shows that people are “less safe” under the Tories. That’s a very convenient retort to Rishi Sunak, because only two days ago he gave a major speech arguing that security was a key reason why his party deserved to win the election.

In a statement, Shabana Mahmood, the shadow justice secretary, said:

The Tories continue to make major and unprecedented changes to the justice system without so much as a word to the public. It’s completely unacceptable and the public will be alarmed at this latest panic measures.

The government is stalling justice and leaving victims in limbo because of the mess they have created. This comes days after they hid from the public that they’re now letting criminals out of jail earlier than ever before.

It is astonishing that lawyers and witnesses, let alone the public, are none the wiser on which cases will actually be affected – how many people will be let out on bail when they should have been remanded, and how will the government ensure public safety is not compromised?

This is no way to run the justice system, and it is certainly no way to run the country. Communities will rightly conclude that they’re less safe under Rishi Sunak’s Tory party.

Nick Thomas-Symonds, a shadow Cabinet Office minister, has been giving interviews on behalf of Labour this morning. On the government plan to ramp up stop and search, he was relatively non-committal, saying in some circumstances this was a valuable tool. He told GB News:

The government is completely failing [on knife crime]. We’ve had an 80% increase since 2015 and rises all around the country. That’s the first point.

On stop and search, that is intelligence lead and evidence-based and is a really important tool. We’ve had, for example, the Inspectorate of Constabulary, an independent organisation, looking at this saying that what’s essential is that it is done in that targeted way.

In a non-targeted way, when it isn’t evidence based, it does lead to a lack of community [cohesion].

This is what the Criminal Law Solicitors’ Association sent to members last night about court hearings being delayed.

Emergency measure triggered to help with prison population, says Law Society

The Law Society has issued this statement about today’s decision to delay some court hearings because of prison overcrowding.

We have been made aware that from today, the lord chancellor is triggering an emergency measure, Operation Early Dawn, to deal with the worsening problem of the prison population.

Many magistrates’ court cases will be delayed. Practitioners will not know if their clients’ cases will be delayed for sure until they get there.

This particular impact will be caused by a triage process for defendants being transferred from police custody suites to the magistrates courts and then likely to be transferred to prison. We understand priority will be given to defendants in the most serious cases. We understand that defendants who are not prioritised will be released on police bail.

We are awaiting further urgent information from HMCTS and MoJ to clarify the practical implications of this decision, including how they will deal with the issue of the wasted costs members may incur in these circumstances.

We will update members in due course.

Updated

Court hearings delayed as Ministry of Justice slows proceedings due to prison overcrowding

Some court hearings in England are going to be delayed because of prison overcrowding, the BBC is reporting. In their story Chris Mason and Jennifer McKiernan report:

Courts in England in areas with a lack of prison places will be affected for around a week.

A solicitors’ group said many magistrates’ court cases will be affected as officials decide which defendants will be prioritised.

The move, called Operation Early Dawn, is expected to impact courts in England for around a week in regions where there is a lack of prison places.

The Ministry of Justice told the BBC that the government is creating thousands more prison places to meet demand. The Criminal Law Solicitors Association said:

We are appalled of the state of our criminal justice system and have been campaigning on this from our inception and whilst we recognise the need for some action, this is a symptom of a systemic problem caused by more than 40 years of neglect of our criminal justice system.

Chris Philp, the policing minister, told Sky News this morning that equipment allowing the police to scan people for knives at a distance is almost ready to be rolled out. He explained:

A police officer could scan people walking down the street at a distance of six or 10 feet to see if they’re carrying a knife.

So scanning large numbers of people, that’s not ready for deployment today, but I’m hoping by the end of this year it can be deployed experimentally or in a test way.

Jeremy Hunt and Mel Stride warn against benefits ‘lifestyle choice’

Jeremy Hunt, the chancellor, and Mel Stride, the work and pensions secretary, have suggested that too many people are claiming unemployment benefit as a lifestyle choice in a joint article published in the Times. Matthew Weaver has the story here.

The Labour party has not press released anything about stop and search or sex education this morning, but it is attacking the government’s record on sewage. In a response to a BBC story revealing that millions of litres of raw sewage were pumped into Windermere in February, because a water company took 10 hours to address a problem with a broken pump, Steve Reed, the shadow environment secretary, said:

The Conservatives just folded their arms and looked the other way while United Utilities pumped a tidal wave of raw sewage into Britain’s most beautiful lake.

It’s time for change.

The next Labour government will put the water companies under special measures to force United Utilities to clean up their toxic mess.

We will give the regulator tough new powers to make law-breaking water bosses face criminal charges and ban the payment of their multi-million pound bonuses until they clean up their toxic filth.

Updated

Curbs on sex education use pupils as ‘political football’, school leaders say

School leaders have accused the government of using children as “a political football” over its proposals to restrict sex education lessons in England, Richard Adams reports.

Minister says stop and search to be ramped up, dismissing concerns about disproportionate targeting of black men

Good morning. It would be nice to think that the government is not entirely focused on re-election, and that not all decisions are being made with partisan considerations to the fore, but it can be hard to sustain that view after a glance at the papers. Today the government has put two issues on the table – both of which might appeal to a Tory election strategist hoping to find something (anything?) that might create a dividing line with Labour.

First, sex education. Gillian Keegan, the education secretary, is expected to publish plans tomorrow, but right-leaning papers have been briefed that the rules for schools in England will be stricter and that they will be told not to teach pupils about gender identity issues.

Our story, by Richard Adams and Pippa Crerar, is here.

The advantage of briefing out a story like this in advance, from the government’s point of view, is that reports get written up on the basis of what sources tell reporters, not on the basis of what a document actually says. But the disadvantage is that this makes it easy for Labour to say it won’t comment until it has seen the detail, but which time the media caravan will have moved on.

And, second, there is an announcement about ramping up stop and search to counter knife crime.

Chris Philp, the policing minister, has been giving interviews about this topic this morning and he told LBC:

I’d like to see officers, of course, use the power lawfully and also respectfully, but it does need to be used more to protect the public and particularly the kind of young men who often end up being victims of knife crime.

When it was put to him that in the past stop and search has been used disproportionately against young black men, he replied:

The sad truth is that young black men are disproportionately victims of knife crime and we’re doing this as much to protect them as anything else.

He also said that stop and search success rates typically have a success rate of 25 to 30%.

That percentage is pretty much the same across something to within 1% across all ethnicities so that gives me quite a high degree of confidence that police are not unreasonably picking on particular parts of the community.

Philp was also on the Today programme where Emma Barnett, who has just joined the programme as a presenter, pointed out that when Theresa May was home secretary she restricted the use of stop and search. She asked why the government was performing a U-turn. In response, Philp said stop and search rates in London have fallen by 44% in the past two years. When Barnett put it to him that May’s policy had failed, Philp dodged the question.

Talking of Theresa May, there was some speculation last night that Labour might announce another defector in time for PMQs today. May told Bethany Dawson from Politico that it would not be her.

Asked if she would stand again as a Conservative, Theresa May tonight said “I am a Conservative, I would stand again as a Conservative,” largely quashing the excitement of people thinking of the funniest option for defection.

Labour sources are saying that hacks on defector watch should stand down today. But the very fact that it did not seem totally absurd for a reporter to ask a former PM if they would defect to another party does say something about the state of Rishi Sunak’s Conservative party.

Here is the agenda for the day.

9.30am: Brian Bell, chair of the Migration Advisory Committee, and other migration experts give evidence to the Commons home affairs committee.

10am: Arlene Foster, the former Northern Ireland first minister, gives evidence to the UK Covid inquiry in Belfast.

12pm: Rishi Sunak faces Keir Starmer at PMQs.

After 12.45pm: MPs begin the first day of the debate on the remaining stages of the criminal justice bill.

3pm: Michael Tomlinson, the minister for illegal migration, gives evidence to the joint committee on human rights.

For technical reasons we are not using the ‘send us a message’ feature any more, and if you want to contact me, please post a message below the line (BTL) or message me on X (Twitter). I can’t read all the messages BTL, but if you put “Andrew” in a message aimed at me, I am more likely to see it because I search for posts containing that word. If you want to flag something up urgently, it is best to use X; I’ll see something addressed to @AndrewSparrow very quickly. I find it very helpful when readers point out mistakes, even minor typos (no error is too small to correct). And I find your questions very interesting too. I can’t promise to reply to them all, but I will try to reply to as many as I can, either BTL or sometimes in the blog.

Updated

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Is intermittent fasting better than counting calories? Maybe not, but you might stick with it
Intermittent fasting, where people eat what they want, but only during certain daily windows of time, has skyrocketed in popularity in recent years
The Independent UK
The Independent UK
Jerrod Carmichael Reality Show: features one of the most painful family arguments ever seen on TV
This excruciatingly revealing reality show is so extreme it’s hard to believe that what you’re watching is the truth – and maybe you’re not
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
A new AI service allows viewers to create TV shows. Are we doomed?
Showrunner will let users generate episodes with prompts, which could be an alarming next step or a fleeting novelty
The Guardian - US
The Guardian - US
Madonna sued for "pornography" on stage
This is the second lawsuit leveled at the singer for her Celebration world tour
Salon
Salon
Bianca Censori Tests The Patience Of Italians Once More As She Covers Up Again With A Pillow
"Wouldn't it be easier to just put some clothes on?" The post Bianca Censori Tests The Patience Of Italians Once More As She Covers Up Again With A Pillow first appeared on Bored Panda.
Bored Panda
Bored Panda
Michael Jackson's children blocked from late singer's trust over '$700m tax bill'
Michael Jackson’s three children and his mother have been blocked from receiving funds from the late singer’s trust until a hefty tax bill has been settled.
Evening Standard
Evening Standard
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.
Download on the AppStore Get it on Google Play