Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
Politics

When doctors withhold futile treatments, that isn’t ‘assisted dying’

A doctor holding the hand of a female patient lying in a hospital bed
‘Intentions are important. When I withhold or withdraw a life-sustaining treatment it is because I fear that the balance has shifted and that the burdens outweigh the benefits.’ Photograph: Virojt Changyencham/Getty Images

I write in response to Dr Jagat Aulakh’s letter (A form of assisted dying already happens in hospitals, 8 May). It must be made clear that withholding or withdrawing futile treatments is not and never has been assisted dying. Stopping – or not starting – treatments that are not wanted, are not working or are not worthwhile is good medicine and the law of the land. Whereas “assisted dying” is the modern euphemism for physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia, both forms of medicalised killing.

The General Medical Council’s Good Medical Practice guidance states: “Patients must be able to trust medical professionals with their lives and health. To justify that trust [doctors] must make the care of patients [their] first concern.” Assisted suicide and euthanasia is incompatible with such a duty. How can patients trust professionals who facilitate their killing?

Elsewhere, the GMC outlines that high-quality care involves balancing benefits, burdens and risks of treatments; that life-prolonging treatment can lawfully be withheld or withdrawn from a patient who lacks capacity when starting or continuing treatment is not in their best interests; that there is no obligation to give treatment that is futile or burdensome; and that decisions concerning potentially life-prolonging treatment must not be motivated by a desire to bring about the patient’s death.

Intentions are important. When I withhold or withdraw a life-sustaining treatment, it is because I fear that the balance has shifted and that the burdens outweigh the benefits; my patient is now irreversibly dying, and it is time to “let nature take its course” with dignity and care. Physician-assisted suicide is another entity altogether. It is an independent causal act intended to prematurely terminate the life of a patient. My hope, particularly for those vulnerable patients in my care, is that it will never be lawful within these shores.
Dr James Haslam
Consultant in intensive care medicine and anaesthesia, Salisbury

• Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.