During the recent testimony, it was revealed that Pecker claimed he was unaware of the specifics of the transaction between Cohen and Daniels as it was happening. He stated that he only became aware later on that Cohen had personally funded the payment to Daniels. Pecker mentioned, 'That was the first time I had heard of that.'
This revelation sheds light on the sequence of events surrounding the payment made to Daniels, adding a new dimension to the ongoing investigation. Pecker's testimony indicates that there was a lack of real-time knowledge regarding the financial arrangement between Cohen and Daniels.
Pecker's statement raises questions about the level of transparency and communication within the involved parties during the transaction. The fact that he was not informed of the details at the time suggests a potential breakdown in communication or a deliberate effort to keep certain aspects of the transaction confidential.
As the investigation continues, further details may emerge regarding the dynamics between Cohen, Daniels, and Pecker, providing a clearer picture of the events leading up to the payment. The testimony highlights the complexity of the situation and the need for thorough examination to uncover the full extent of the interactions between the individuals involved.
