Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
Environment
Helena Horton Environment reporter

Alok Sharma condemns government’s oil and gas bill as vote passes first hurdle

Alok Sharma
Alok Sharma: ‘Today we have a bill before this house, the sole purpose of which is to double down on granting more oil and gas production licences.’ Photograph: Isabel Infantes/AFP/Getty Images

Alok Sharma has said the government’s oil and gas bill going through the Commons will not cut household energy costs or create jobs and instead will break the UK’s promise to phase out fossil fuels.

The government’s offshore petroleum licensing bill passed its second reading on Monday night with 293 votes to 211 against. No Conservative MPs voted against it, and Sharma – the former business secretary who served as president of the Cop26 climate talks – abstained. The legislation would place the North Sea Transition Authority under a duty to run annual applications for new offshore oil and gas licences.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, made up of hundreds of scientists, has said no new oil and gas licences should be granted if the world is to limit global heating to 1.5C above pre-industrial levels. Going beyond this would cause climate catastrophe, ruining the lives of millions. UK ministers promised to phase out oil and gas at last year’s Cop28 conference in Dubai.

Referring to minister Graham Stuart who represented the UK at the conference, Sharma said: “My right honourable friend tweeted himself at Cop28 that there must be an unabated phaseout of fossil fuels to meet our climate goals. But today we have a bill before this house, the sole purpose of which is to double down on granting more oil and gas production licences. I do not believe, and it pains me to say this, that this bill will advance that commitment to transition away from fossil fuels.”

He said the bill would not lower bills or create jobs, despite the claims of the energy secretary, Claire Coutinho. Sharma said: “This bill is about improving domestic energy security. But I think we all understand that the oil and gas extracted from the North Sea is owned by private enterprises and the government does not control who it is sold to. We all understand that this does not necessarily lower bills. We have to acknowledge that 200,000 jobs supported by the oil and gas industry have been lost over the last decade, and that is despite hundreds of new drilling licences being issued.”

He added that skills in the oil and gas industry were fully transferrable to green energy and said the government should instead focus on “more wind power, more solar, more nuclear”.

Ed Miliband pointed out that a host of Tories including former net zero tsar, Chris Skidmore, who resigned as an MP over the government’s plans, former prime minister Theresa May and Sharma had all criticised the bill.

The shadow energy secretary referred to the bill as “climate vandalism”, telling the Commons: “We face massive challenges as a country but it isn’t the scale of our problems that is apparent today, it’s the smallness of their response.” He said the bill was “risible” and would not make any difference to Britain’s energy security.

But Coutinho said the bill would “improve energy security here and in Europe”, adding: “We do not live in a world where we can simply turn off oil and gas.” She said the UK was “blessed” with the North Sea and the fossil fuels contained within.

Some Tory MPs expressed concern over the bill. Vicky Ford, MP for Chelmsford said: “The perception internationally is that by granting these licences, the UK may be walking away from our promises on climate change.”

However, she and fellow Conservative Environment Network member, Jerome Mayhew, said they would be voting for the bill but at a later date would vote for amendments that would force the UK oil and gas industry to operate in a lower carbon way.

It was thought Theresa May could rebel as she is understood not to agree with the bill, and she was the prime minister to sign net zero into law. However, she was away from the Commons and therefore abstained.

Skidmore urged his colleagues to vote against the bill. He said: “As I stated in my resignation letter, the future will judge harshly any MP that votes for new additional fossil fuels. Today’s legislation makes no economic sense, will deliver no additional energy security, and breaks the UK’s international commitments on climate action.”

Greenpeace UK’s political campaigner, Ami McCarthy, said: “The government may have won this vote but the planet and everyone on it has lost as a result. Literally no one benefits from this nonsensical, climate-wrecking bill except the oil and gas industry and its shareholders.”

Alasdair Johnstone, from the Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, added: “The North Sea is in terminal decline and this only serves to distract from actual solutions to securing the UK’s energy independence which lie in reducing our need for gas in the first place. That means building out renewables and insulating cold, damp homes, areas where the government’s recent track record is questionable.”

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.